Strong Acids (HCl, HNO3, H2SO4)

What is the pH of the strong acids HCl, HNO3 and H2SO4 in the concentration range between 10-6 and 1.0 moles per liter?

Preliminary Considerations

Strong acids ionize completely in an aqueous solution, HA → H+ + A-. Thus, based on the pH definition we can write:

(1) pH  =  – log {H+}  =  – log γ – log [H+]  =  – log γ – log [HA]

Approximations

If we ignore activity corrections at all, that is, if we set log γ = 0, then we get two approximate formulas:

(2) pH ≈ -log [HA]     (for monoprotic acid HA)
(3) pH ≈ -log 2 [H2A] (for diprotic acid H2A)

The factor 2 in 3 results from the fact that H2SO4 can release two H+ ions. But caution: hydrogen sulfate (HSO4-) is — in contrast to H2SO4 — not a strong acid. In other words, 3 isn’t a very good approximation.

Exact Calculation with aqion

How to calculate the pH of an acid is explained here. The same procedure is used for all three acids at 8 concentration values. The results are displayed here, together with the two approximations in 2 and (3):

concentration [M] approx. (2) HCl HNO3 approx. (3) H2SO4
1·10-6 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.70 5.70
1·10-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.70 4.70
1·10-4 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.70 3.71
1·10-3 3.00 3.01 3.01 2.70 2.75
1·10-2 2.00 2.04 2.04 1.70 1.87
1·10-1 1.00 1.08 1.08 0.70 1.01
0.5 0.30 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.38
1.0 0.00 0.13 0.13 -0.3 0.10

[Be careful with the concentration units in aqion: In place of 1·10-6 M enter 0.001 mmol/L, etc.]

Two Conclusions

First.  For concentrations up to about 1 mM the approximations coincide with the exact values. At higher concentrations, however, the approximations become worse because they ignore activity corrections. The difference between the exact and approximate pH provides just the activity correction:

(4) pHexact – pHapprox = –log γ

[An example how to calculate the activity correction (based on the extended Debye-Hückel formula) is given here for 0.1 M HCl.]

Second.  The deviation from the exact pH is especially acute for the diprotic H2SO4. It was already mentioned above that 3 is a bad approximation.

Pitfall.  One might expect that the approximation in 2 becomes especially correct for very small concentrations. But the opposite is true, here is a counter example.

[last modified: 2023-11-16]